### Incident 11 (Row 12): Malicious Voting During Oral Re-Exam in Mathematics
* **AAUP Redbook Review (C):** The link proves the student passed. A department chair voting to fail a student who missed zero questions is a textbook violation of the AAUP Redbook, Part IV.A: “Protection Against Improper Academic Evaluation.” It constitutes capricious and malicious grading.
* **ADA Review (D):** Subjecting a disabled student to arbitrary, malicious grading standards that are not applied to non-disabled peers violates Title II equal access and anti-discrimination provisions.
* **Title IX / VII Review (E):** A department chair leveraging their power to arbitrarily fail a protected-class student is a severe incident of discriminatory harassment, solidifying the presence of a hostile environment.
* **Veteran / VEVRAA Review (F):** Maliciously targeting a disabled veteran during high-stakes testing is discriminatory and violates federal protections meant to ensure fair evaluation of veteran students.