Dr. Steinhardt,
I have set up the AI chat analysis at https://gradadvocate.com/ The posts explain (1) the exact instructions for the AI, (2) the exact documents embedded in the AI (3 papers on Copernicus + the 180 page document submitted with my original petition). Also, a list of needs generated by the AI for a complete and unbiased evaluation.
I will add more material which will be continuously updated as “posts” on the sidebar menu, including formal tech documents as I find them. You will not hear from me again. All my activity will be reflected on this new website.
The origins of Copernicus are notoriously vague. For such a famous and important software, that’s somewhat disconcerting. If you have PDF files you want me to embed in the AI i will gladly do that. Otherwise, you can use the AI as a research and evaluation tool. Or not. It’s public and will remain so; I’m sure others will be interested.
I’d be happy to update the instructions or do anything else helpful. Regardless of whether there was IP theft, the circumstances of my dismissal are horrific. I’m not sure if that is part of your “research integrity” job, but if it’s not, then what is shown via official documents on clark-vs-utaustin.com should concern SOMEBODY there. Or not.
Regards,
Bill Clark, P.E. (Retired)